Single-app sprawl
As more modules are added, one large app folder makes ownership and refactors harder.
Stack / Monorepo Architecture
A monorepo architecture that keeps product surfaces and shared packages readable under real growth
BunShip uses Bun and Turborepo to organize marketing, app, admin, docs, and shared packages into a predictable workspace that is easier to scale than a single tangled app.
- Shared packages with explicit boundaries
- Marketing, app, and admin in one workspace
- Docs and blocks can evolve without forking the app
- Supports faster feature delivery and safer refactors
10+
Workspace packages
Shared contracts, UI, data, and app surfaces stay organized as the product grows.
3
User-facing surfaces
Marketing, app, and admin coexist without becoming one giant folder tree.
1
System model
The product can scale across packages without changing the delivery story.
The goal is not monorepo theater. The goal is keeping feature ownership, package boundaries, and release workflows understandable.
The goal is not monorepo theater. The goal is keeping feature ownership, package boundaries, and release workflows understandable.
Shared UI packageShared DB packageApp boundariesDocs integration
What this page solves
Architecture pages should answer evaluation questions that do not belong on sales-heavy feature pages.
Shared code without boundaries
Teams need package-level contracts instead of ad hoc imports everywhere.
Docs and product drifting apart
A monorepo keeps docs, UI, app logic, and shared packages closer together.
What's included
Keep this page focused on workspace and package architecture rather than broad feature claims.
Bun + Turborepo workspace
The stack is organized around shared packages and app surfaces that can evolve independently.
Separation of app surfaces
Marketing, app, admin, and docs live within the same product system but keep clear boundaries.
Shared contracts and utilities
UI, data, and other common behavior are extracted into reusable packages.
Why it matters
This page is for technical due diligence and should strengthen confidence without competing with feature pages.
Improves maintainability
Clear package ownership reduces the cost of adding modules and changing implementations.
Supports faster delivery
Teams can ship across marketing, product, and admin surfaces with less duplication.
Strengthens implementation trust
Buyers see that BunShip has a system model, not just a bundle of pages.
Implementation notes
Point technical readers to architecture and codebase docs rather than repeating them here.
Who it's for
Useful for buyers evaluating technical maintainability rather than module-level conversion.
Technical founders
Understand how BunShip is organized before committing to it as a long-term base.
Startup engineering leads
Assess whether the package boundaries fit a growing team and product surface.
Agency teams
See how shared packages can support repeated client delivery.
FAQ
Keep this page architecture-specific so it does not compete with product feature pages.
Next step
Use this page for technical due diligence, then route back into the broader architecture or pricing story
Read the codebase docs or return to the stacks overview.